Court Orders ISP to Filter Content - SABAM v SA Scarlet
A Belgian court has ordered an internet service provider to use filtering technology on its systems to root out copyright-infringing content. In SCRL Societe Belge Des Auteurs v SA Scarlet (No. 04/8975/A) the ISP Scarlet (formerlyTiscali) was found liable in 2004 for the unauthorised exchange of music files through its service and, in a judgment made available this week, the Belgian Court of First Instance has ordered Scarlet to put into place blocking and filtering mechanisms to stop its users sending or receiving music throughpeer-to-peerapplications.
The Court had been understandably reluctant to enforce its 2004 injunction against Scarlet without knowing if an effective technical solution existed so it ordered an expert evaluation. The experts looked at various solutions £ including the Audible Magic application £CopySense Network Appliance£ £ and found that there were affordable measures Scarlet could take to block P2P on its network without affecting other legitimate internet exchanges.
Scarlet now has six months to implement a suitable solution, which the Court said should cost no more than £0.50 per month per user and was therefore £not excessive£.
Aside from the slightly-uncomfortable notion of a court making technical and commercial evaluations of IT products, it is perhaps most surprising that a European court has ordered a telecoms provider to explore the information in its systems at all. The court apparently did not fully consider the £Mere Conduit£ protections for ISPs (known in the US as £Safe Harbor£) though it took pains to distinguish this filtering and blocking order from any type of £surveillance£ which would have been contrary to EU law.
This decision will be seen as a foothold for music companies in its fight against P2P file sharing, but most of the big questions £ especially those regarding secondary liability, telecoms£ immunity and free speech £ remain unanswered. IF Belgium has correctly implemented the underlying EU laws and this court has correctly interpreted those laws, and other EU countries have similar correct implementations, then this decision may be followed £ though not as a precedent £ elsewhere within the EU. This is, however, a big IF and, in any case, Scarlet may yet appeal the decision.
Clintons Media News bulletin service is intended to alert clients and friends of notable media and entertainment law and business developments. It contains general information about English (or other) law. It does not contain legal advice. For further information on any specific legal matter, please consult a solicitor at Clintons using the contact details in the right hand column.
Legal Day Table
Jobs Now
LEGAL DIRECTOR Sought for challenging in-house position with Myspace, the online space which has revolutionized the way people interact, as sole attorney in their London office More >>
HEALTHCARE LAWYER With at least 5 years PQE sought by Capsticks, a leading healthcare practice, to drive forward the development of their Birmigham based office More >>
PI PARALEGAL Required by Plexus Law, a specialist PI firm, to provide in-house support to the Motor Claims Department in their Folkstone offices More >>
NETWORK ENGINEER Sought by Personnel 2000 for their client, an international banking insurance provider, based in the Cayman Islands More >>
LEGAL SECRETARY Required by Law Choice for their client, a prestigious US law firm, to work for 2 partners in their Dubai offices More >>
Contact
Clintons 55 Drury Lane London WC2B 5RZ Tel 44 207 379 6080 Fax 44 207 240 9310 http://www.clintons.co.uk
